Who Was Really the First Supermodel? The Truth Behind Fashion’s Original Icon

Who Was Really the First Supermodel? The Truth Behind Fashion’s Original Icon
By Sierra Whitley 7 November 2025 8 Comments

When you think of supermodels, names like Naomi Campbell, Cindy Crawford, or Gigi Hadid probably pop up. But who was the very first person to earn that title? The answer isn’t as simple as a Wikipedia entry might suggest. The first supermodel wasn’t crowned by a magazine or signed to a billion-dollar contract. She was quietly reshaping fashion decades before the term even existed.

The Real First Supermodel: Lisa Fonssagrives

The woman most historians agree was the first supermodel is Lisa Fonssagrives. Born in Sweden in 1911, she didn’t start out in fashion-she was a dancer. But when she moved to Paris in the 1930s, her tall, elegant frame caught the eye of photographers like Irving Penn and Man Ray. By the 1940s and 50s, she was everywhere: covers of Vogue, Harper’s Bazaar, and Life magazine. She wasn’t just a model; she was the face of modern fashion.

What made her different? She didn’t just pose. She brought movement, emotion, and personality to the frame. At a time when models were treated like mannequins, Fonssagrives made clothes look alive. She worked with Christian Dior, Balenciaga, and Elsa Schiaparelli-not as a background figure, but as a collaborator. Designers trusted her to show their work in the best possible light. That kind of influence? That’s supermodel status.

Why ‘Supermodel’ Didn’t Exist Until Later

The word ‘supermodel’ wasn’t used until the 1980s, when brands started paying models like million-dollar deals. But the concept? It started with Fonssagrives. She earned more than $5,000 a week in the 1950s-that’s over $60,000 today, adjusted for inflation. She was the first model to have a career that lasted beyond a single season. She didn’t just work for one brand; she became a global symbol of elegance.

She also married photographer Fernand Fonssagrives, and together they helped shape how fashion photography was done. Their work laid the foundation for every editorial shoot you see today. She was the prototype: beautiful, professional, and powerful. No one else in her era had that kind of reach, recognition, or financial power.

Who Else Gets Mentioned-and Why They’re Not the First

Some people argue for Jean Patchett or Dovima. Patchett was huge in the 1950s, appearing on more magazine covers than anyone else at the time. Dovima famously posed with elephants for Dior in 1955. Both were iconic. But neither had Fonssagrives’ combination of longevity, global influence, or creative partnership with top designers.

Then there’s Twiggy in the 1960s. She was a cultural phenomenon-teenage, androgynous, and everywhere. But she was the first teen model, not the first supermodel. She represented a shift in fashion, not the origin of it.

And what about the 1980s icons? Cindy, Naomi, Linda, Christy, and Claudia? They were the first to be called ‘supermodels’-but they built on the path Fonssagrives paved. She proved models could be stars, not just mannequins. They turned that idea into a global industry.

Lisa Fonssagrives walking confidently on a 1950s Paris street in a Schiaparelli suit.

The Legacy of the First Supermodel

Lisa Fonssagrives didn’t just walk runways or smile for cameras. She changed how fashion worked. Before her, models were anonymous. After her, they became celebrities. She was the first to be photographed in motion, the first to be named in articles, the first to be paid like a star. She even had her own line of cosmetics.

Her influence is still visible today. When a model today walks a runway with confidence, or when a photographer captures a candid moment that feels real-that’s Fonssagrives’ legacy. She made fashion personal. She made it emotional. She made it matter.

How the Supermodel Title Evolved

The 1980s changed everything. With the rise of global TV, fashion became entertainment. Brands realized models could sell more than clothes-they could sell lifestyles. That’s when the term ‘supermodel’ was coined, and the industry started paying millions. But without Fonssagrives, none of that would have been possible.

She was the bridge between the silent models of the 1930s and the rock-star models of the 1990s. She didn’t need a reality show or a billion-dollar perfume deal to be famous. Her face alone was enough.

Why It Matters Today

Understanding who the first supermodel was isn’t just about history. It’s about recognizing how much power models have always held. Today, influencers and TikTok stars are called the new supermodels. But they’re following a blueprint created by a Swedish dancer in 1945.

Fonssagrives showed that a model could be more than a body in a dress. She was a storyteller, a collaborator, a brand. That’s what makes a supermodel-not the paycheck, but the impact.

Lisa Fonssagrives' silhouette glowing with modern supermodels emerging from her form.

Comparison: Early Icons vs. Modern Supermodels

Early Icons vs. Modern Supermodels
Feature Lisa Fonssagrives (1940s-50s) Modern Supermodel (1990s-2020s)
Primary Medium Print magazines (Vogue, Harper’s Bazaar) TV, social media, billboards, campaigns
Recognition Known among fashion insiders and elite audiences Known worldwide, even by non-fashion fans
Earnings $5,000/week (equivalent to ~$60,000 today) $10M-$30M/year per contract
Brand Control Worked with designers directly Owns brands, launches lines, negotiates equity
Public Persona Elegant, quiet, mysterious Outspoken, curated, highly visible
Influence Laid the foundation for modeling as a career Defined global beauty standards and pop culture

Frequently Asked Questions

Was Lisa Fonssagrives the only model to earn high pay in the 1950s?

Yes, she was the only one. While other models earned good money, Fonssagrives was the first to be paid like a star. She made more than most actors and was featured in major news stories. No other model before her had that level of financial power or public recognition.

Why isn’t Lisa Fonssagrives as famous today as Cindy Crawford?

Because she worked in an era before TV and the internet. Her fame was real but limited to print media and fashion circles. Today’s supermodels are visible 24/7 on social media, which makes them more recognizable to the general public. But in fashion history, she’s the original.

Did Lisa Fonssagrives have any rivals in her time?

She had competitors like Dovima and Jean Patchett, but none matched her consistency or creative influence. Fonssagrives worked with the biggest designers, appeared on the most covers, and was the most photographed model of her decade. She wasn’t just popular-she was essential.

What made her different from models before her?

Before her, models were faceless. They stood still, didn’t smile, and were rarely named. Fonssagrives moved naturally, smiled, and was credited in magazines. She turned modeling from a job into a performance-and made it art.

Is there any footage of Lisa Fonssagrives modeling?

Very little. Most of her work was still photography. But there are rare film clips from fashion shows in Paris in the late 1940s where you can see her walk. Her posture, her grace-it’s unmistakable. You can see why designers adored her.

Final Thought: The First Supermodel Wasn’t Famous-She Was Essential

Lisa Fonssagrives didn’t need a hashtag to be legendary. She didn’t need a TV show or a billion followers. She just showed up, did her job better than anyone else, and changed the game. The supermodel title didn’t exist when she started-but it was born because of her.

Next time you see a model on a billboard, remember: that power, that presence, that star quality-it all started with a Swedish dancer in a Paris studio, turning fabric into feeling. She wasn’t just the first supermodel. She was the reason the title even means something today.

8 Comments
Emmanuel Jolly November 8 2025

Let’s be real-this whole ‘first supermodel’ thing is just another case of history being rewritten by people who think elegance is a currency. Lisa Fonssagrives? Sure, she looked nice in black and white. But calling her a ‘supermodel’ is like calling a candle a lighthouse because it’s the only light in a dark room. The term wasn’t invented until the 80s for a reason: power, visibility, and money. None of that existed for her. She was a pretty face in a magazine. That’s it.

And don’t get me started on the ‘she changed fashion’ nonsense. Fashion didn’t need changing-it needed selling. And selling only became real when models started commanding contracts, not just smiles.

Let’s stop romanticizing silence. The real supermodels spoke up, demanded equity, and turned their faces into empires. Fonssagrives? She just posed. And that’s fine. But don’t call her a pioneer when she never broke a single chain.

Krishna Prasad Regmi November 8 2025

Wow, this is such a beautiful reminder of how legacy isn’t always loud. Lisa Fonssagrives didn’t need viral clips or brand deals to matter. She moved with grace, and that grace became the standard. I’ve seen old photos of her-there’s something in her eyes, like she knew she was painting something bigger than a dress.

It’s easy to think modern supermodels are the first because they’re everywhere, but real influence? It’s quiet. It’s in the way photographers learned to capture motion because of her. It’s in every model who walks like they own the air around them.

She didn’t need a billion followers. She had the runway, the lens, and the respect of legends. That’s enough.

Devin Payne November 10 2025

First of all, ‘supermodel’ is a term that emerged in the 1980s, and anyone who tries to retroactively apply it to someone from the 1940s is either misinformed or deliberately rewriting history for clickbait. Second, Fonssagrives was a model, yes-but she was not ‘the first supermodel.’ She was one of many elegant European models working for Vogue during a time when American fashion was still catching up.

And let’s not pretend she had ‘creative partnership’ with designers. She was a mannequin with better posture. The term ‘collaborator’ is a modern delusion. Designers didn’t ‘trust’ her-they hired her because she was tall, thin, and didn’t talk back.

Also, $5,000 a week? Adjusted for inflation? That’s still less than what a mid-tier TV actor made back then. Don’t inflate her earnings to fit a narrative. This article is pure revisionist fantasy dressed up as journalism.

Conor Burke November 10 2025

There are multiple grammatical and factual inaccuracies in this piece that undermine its credibility. First, ‘supermodel’ was not coined in the 1980s-it was first used in print in 1973 by a Vogue editor referring to Twiggy. Second, Fonssagrives was not the first model to be credited by name in magazines; that honor goes to Jean Patchett in 1948, who was explicitly named in advertisements and editorials.

Also, the claim that she was the only model paid $5,000/week in the 1950s is unsubstantiated. No credible wage records from that era support that figure. The inflation calculator cited is misleading-it doesn’t account for cost-of-living differences between Europe and the U.S. at the time.

This article reads like a Wikipedia fanfic with emotional embellishments. The facts are thin, the tone is reverent, and the analysis is superficial. Please, stop romanticizing vague anecdotes as historical truth.

Melissa Garner November 11 2025

OMG I CRIED reading this 😭😭 Lisa Fonssagrives is my new spirit animal!! She didn’t need a phone or a TikTok to be iconic-she just had grace, soul, and the guts to move like she mattered. 🙌

And honestly? Modern models are so filtered and scripted. They’re influencers first, models second. But Lisa? She was pure art. Every photo feels like a poem. I just watched that 10-second film clip of her walking-her posture alone could start a revolution.

Someone needs to make a Netflix doc on her. I’ll binge it. And I’ll buy the book. And the perfume. And the t-shirt. 💃✨

Deb O'Hanley November 11 2025

Ugh, this is so typical. People act like Fonssagrives was some forgotten queen when she was just another rich white girl in Paris with good bones. Meanwhile, Black models like Donyale Luna were breaking barriers in the same era and got erased. And now we’re giving a Swedish woman a crown she never asked for?

It’s not about who was first-it’s about who got remembered. And guess what? The system remembers the ones who fit the mold. Fonssagrives fit. Others didn’t.

Stop pretending this is about talent. It’s about privilege.

Patti Towhill November 12 2025

I love how this post doesn’t just name a person-it tells a quiet revolution. Fonssagrives didn’t scream for attention, but she made the whole room change its rhythm. That’s real power.

I’m from a small town in Ohio, and I never knew her name until now. But after reading this, I get it. She didn’t need to be famous to be important. She just had to be herself-elegant, present, alive.

It’s funny. Today we think being loud is the only way to matter. But her story reminds me that sometimes, the softest footsteps leave the deepest prints.

Thank you for sharing this. I’m going to show my daughter her photos tonight. She needs to know beauty isn’t always loud.

Suman Jr November 13 2025

Just wanted to say thank you for writing this with such care. It’s easy to overlook the quiet pioneers, especially when the spotlight’s always on the loudest voices. Fonssagrives didn’t need a title to be groundbreaking-she just showed up, did her work, and left a legacy in the way light fell on fabric.

I’m a photographer, and I’ve studied her work for years. There’s a stillness in her images that’s impossible to fake. She wasn’t posing-she was breathing. That’s why designers kept coming back.

And yeah, maybe she wasn’t a ‘supermodel’ by today’s standards. But she was the first to prove that a model could be more than a mannequin. And that’s worth remembering.

Say something